I Want You Poster Uncle Sam, Anor Londo Chests, Meadows Golf Course Scorecard, Head Tour Team Bag, Gps Tracker For Lorry Malaysia, Crown Mark Bed Frame Instructions, "/>I Want You Poster Uncle Sam, Anor Londo Chests, Meadows Golf Course Scorecard, Head Tour Team Bag, Gps Tracker For Lorry Malaysia, Crown Mark Bed Frame Instructions, " />I Want You Poster Uncle Sam, Anor Londo Chests, Meadows Golf Course Scorecard, Head Tour Team Bag, Gps Tracker For Lorry Malaysia, Crown Mark Bed Frame Instructions, " /> loss aversion economics I Want You Poster Uncle Sam, Anor Londo Chests, Meadows Golf Course Scorecard, Head Tour Team Bag, Gps Tracker For Lorry Malaysia, Crown Mark Bed Frame Instructions, "/>I Want You Poster Uncle Sam, Anor Londo Chests, Meadows Golf Course Scorecard, Head Tour Team Bag, Gps Tracker For Lorry Malaysia, Crown Mark Bed Frame Instructions, "/>I Want You Poster Uncle Sam, Anor Londo Chests, Meadows Golf Course Scorecard, Head Tour Team Bag, Gps Tracker For Lorry Malaysia, Crown Mark Bed Frame Instructions, "/>
Home / Barueri / loss aversion economics

loss aversion economics

Loss aversion forms the basis of a lot of behavioural economics, including analysis on The Conversation. Acute administration of D2 dopamine agonists may cause an increase in risky choices in humans. Neuroimaging studies on loss aversion involves measuring brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate whether individual variability in loss aversion were reflected in differences in brain activity through bidirectional or gain or loss specific responses, as well as multivariate source-based morphometry[51] (SBM) to investigate a structural network of loss aversion and univariate voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to identify specific functional regions within this network. immanuel lampe. Consider, for instance, the subjective value of avoiding a loss of $10 compared with gaining $10. Hence, there is a direct link between individual differences in the structural properties of this network and the actual consequences of its associated behavioral defense responses. [30] Loss attention explains this as due to attentional competition between options, and increased attention following the highlighting of small negatives, which can increase the attractiveness of a product or a candidate either due to exposure or learning. The sec- ond part of this article reviews evidence in support of loss aversion. The idea suggests that people have a tendency to stick with what they … In other words, the value people place on avoiding a certain loss is higher than the value of acquiring a gain of equal size. 150 out of 160 eligible teachers participated and were assigned to one of four treatment groups or a control group. We are sitting on a loss. Der Übergang der Verhalte… [21] “Losses loom larger than gains” meaning that people by nature are aversive to losses. Because we have invested so much, we don’t want to give up on this investment. To use these effects as something more than the results of an opinion poll means identifying the sources of variation, so that they can be demonstrated reliably in individual subjects. The theory was first formalised in a 1992 research paper from Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman called Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Larson, F., List, J.A., & Metcalfe, R.D. Cracking Economics The article discusses the positive results of the experiment and estimates the testing gains of those of the "loss" group are associated with an increase in lifetime earnings of between $37,180 and $77,740. However, if the software is not working and giving consistently high marginal costs – it is better to ditch. This can lead to the sunk cost fallacy. Loss aversion refers to people’s tendency to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring gains of equal magnitude. The increase in attention is assumed to have an inverse-U shape effect on performance (following the so called Yerkes-Dodson law). Humans are theorized to be hardwired to be loss averse due to asymmetric evolutionary pressure on losses and gains: "for an organism operating close to the edge of survival, the loss of a day's food could cause death, whereas the gain of an extra day's food would not cause an extra day of life (unless the food could be easily and effectively stored)". The out of pocket phenomenon – In financial decision making, it has been shown that people are more motivated when their incentives are to avoid losing personal resources, as opposed to gaining equivalent resources. "All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects." According to the authors, 'this suggests that there may be significant potential for exploiting loss aversion in the pursuit of both optimal public policy and the pursuit of profits'. The term "loss aversion" first appeared in a 1979 paper by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. .. that all human beings have—this underlying phenomenon that 'I really, really dislike losses, and I will do all I can to avoid losing something'." posits framing merit pay in terms of a loss in order to be most effective. Individual differences in loss aversion are related to variables such as age,[53] gender, and genetic factors[54] affecting thalamic norepinephrine transmission, as well as neural structure and activities. Prospect theory also states the importance of how the situation changes from our current reference point. In earlier studies, both bidirectional mesolimbic responses of activation for gains and deactivation for losses (or vica versa) and gain or loss-specific responses have been seen. [25] For example, pupil diameter and heart rate were found to increase following both gains and losses, but the size of the increase was higher following losses. It is a concept which is not without controversy but the theory is widely-accepted and you can test it for yourself. People are drawn by specific priming and memories to pick an option that benefits them the most. Moreover, under loss aversion losses have a biasing effect whereas under loss attention they can have a debiasing effect. Income effects were ruled out by giving one third of the participants mugs, one third chocolates, and one third neither mug nor chocolate. [17][18] Mkrva, Johnson, Gächter, and Herrmann (2019)[19] cast doubt on these critiques, replicating loss aversion in five unique samples while also showing how the magnitude of loss aversion varies in theoretically predictable ways. The first two alternative explanation are that under-trading was due to transaction costs or misunderstanding—were tested by comparing goods markets to induced-value markets under the same rules. Investing in low-return, guaranteed investments over more promising investments that carry higher risk 2. Both systems work together to help a person avoid losses and gain what is possible.[7]. Heterogeneous gender effects under loss aversion in the economics classroom: A field experiment. This, in turn, increases the chance that someone will take a risk on our product when making a purchasing deci… june 19, 2019 Most try to establish a rule to predict sequences that can occur within a game. Capital Asset Pricing under Loss Aversion, "Systems 1 and 2 thinking processes and cognitive reflection testing in medical students", http://bayersatseguridad.com.ar/docs/99byr4w.php?0732dc=loss-and-gain-meaning, "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias", "Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem", "The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger Than Its Gain? Thus, the five alternative explanations were eliminated in the following ways: Multiple studies have questioned the existence of loss aversion. System 1 and System 2 both go hand in hand when a person is seeking out a pattern. In past behavioral economics studies, users participate up until the threat of loss equals any incurred gains. That is, the unhappiness of losing $10 is greater than the happiness of finding $10. Additional phenomena explained by loss attention: Increased expected value maximization with losses – It was found that individuals are more likely to select choice options with higher expected value (namely, mean outcome) in tasks where outcomes are framed as losses than when they are framed as gains. Die Verlustaversion wird anhand einer hypothetischen Wertfunktion (englisch: value function) modelliert. This helps us make quick answers, think of substitutions, and helps our coherence in each situation. The loss attention account assumes that losses in a given task mainly increase the general attentional resource pool available for that task. “The response to losses is stronger than the response to corresponding gains” is Kahneman’s definition of loss aversion. However, if we owned a £300 bottle of wine and it got dropped, we would be more unhappy. loss aversion and the demand for index insurance. Even though it’s worth more to you if you sell it for $5 at a yard sale, the perceived loss is a killer. Users in behavioral and experimental economics studies decided to cease participation in iterative money-making games when the threat of loss was close to the expenditure of effort, even when the user stood to further their gains. The latter cluster partially overlaps with the right hemispheric one displaying the loss-oriented bidirectional response previously described, but, unlike that region, it mostly involved the posterior insula bilaterally. Thus, wealth effects were controlled for those groups who received mugs and chocolate. A person’s adaption level is their evaluation from a neutral point where outcomes are based on personal reference points. People do not treat gains and losses in a linear way! It also helps with forecasting and in-depth evaluations. The results showed that 86% of those starting with mugs chose mugs, 10% of those starting with chocolates chose mugs, and 56% of those with nothing chose mugs. Definition of loss aversion, a central concept in prospect theory and behavioral economics. All these structures play a critical role in detecting threats and prepare the organism for appropriate action, with the connections between amygdala nuclei and the striatum controlling the avoidance of aversive events. Thomas Amadio, superintendent of Chicago Heights Elementary School District 170, where the experiment was conducted, is quoted in this article stating "the study shows the value of merit pay as an encouragement for better teacher performance". [33], Expectation-based loss aversion is a phenomenon in behavioral economics. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, “Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty”, Advantages and disadvantages of monopolies. While reward anticipation is associated with ventral striatum activation,[46][47] negative outcome anticipation engages the amygdala. Loss attention is consistent with several empirical findings in economics , finance, marketing, and decision making. – A visual guide If we have nothing but gain £20, we will be very happy. Participants were reluctant to work for more than the fixed payment as there was an equal chance their expected compensation would not be met.[37]. Behavioral economics is the study of how human behavior and financial factors intersect. You are welcome to ask any questions on Economics. Maintained routines determine a person’s rational and adventurous choices, and shapes that person’s definitions of rational/adventurous. Yechiam and Hochman[22] found that this effect occurred even when the alternative producing higher expected value was the one that included minor losses. Loss aversion bias affects all decision making, but is often more pronounced when your personal hard-earned money is at stake. Levin, Irwin P., Sandra L. Schneider, and Gary J. Gaeth. This shows that a £100 gain is less than the £100 loss. This effect was consistent over trials, indicating that this was not due to inexperience with the procedure or the market. Kahneman und Tversky beschreiben die Wertfunktion wie folgt: Heuristics (System 2) takes over and the person begins to problem solve and try to find a valid solution. Prospect theory is the person’s most fundamental ways of functioning and thinking that dictate decisions made based on the potential impact of the decision. [21][28], The allure of minor disadvantages – In marketing studies it has been demonstrated that products whose minor negative features are highlighted (in addition to positive features) are perceived as more attractive. 00 00 a.srON-DRE BRÉeA go 30 GR r. 00 . [9] Loss aversion and the endowment effect lead to a violation of the Coase theorem—that "the allocation of resources will be independent of the assignment of property rights when costless trades are possible" (p. 1326). [6]  Prospect theory incorporates adaption level, evaluating skills, and gratification. On the other hand, when anticipating loss, the central and basal nuclei of amygdala, right posterior insula extending into the supramarginal gyrus mediate the output to other structures involved in the expression of fear and anxiety, such as the right parietal operculum and supramarginal gyrus. Even when no choice is required, individual differences in the intrinsic responsiveness of this interoceptive system reflect the impact of anticipated negative effects on evaluative processes, leading preference for avoiding losses rather than acquiring greater but riskier gains. Prospect theory also states the importance of how the situation changes from our current reference point. The somatosensory component included the middle cingulate cortex, as well as the posterior insula and rolandic operculum bilaterally. Brain activity in a right ventral striatum cluster increases particularly when anticipating gains. Prospect theory assumes that losses and gains are valued differently, and thus individuals make decisions based on perceived gains instead of perceived losses. Buying a car or committing to a mortgage stand out as major, energy-draining decisions. On the other hand, loss attention was found even for small payoffs, such as $1. [citation needed], The Washington Post discussed merit pay in a 2012 article and specifically the study conducted by Fryer et al. Loss aversion coupled with myopia has been shown to explain macroeconomic phenomena, such as the equity premium puzzle.[5]. Losses and gains have the same weight no matter their scale. Both systems follow a person’s adaption level, evaluating skills, and their need for immediate gratification. 2019/07 . There are functional differences between the right and left amygdala. You will also see this effect very often in the stock market. Mental accounting occurs when we compartmentalise our spending. Loss aversion is also not a prediction of growth-rate maximising behaviour in the additive world. [35], Subsequent research performed by Johannes Abeler, Armin Falk, Lorenz Goette, and David Huffman in conjunction with the Institute of Labor Economics used the framework of Kőszegi and Rabin to prove that people experience expectation-based loss aversion at multiple thresholds. Thus later studies[50] rather than focusing on subjects in groups, focus more on individual differences in the neural bases by jointly looking at behavioural analyses and neuroimaging. In several studies examining the effect of losses in decision making under risk and uncertainty no loss aversion was found. Namely, a highly advantageous alternative producing minor losses was more attractive compared when it did not produce losses. [26] This effect as well was found in the absence of loss aversion.[26]. Loss Aversion: The Behavioural Bias Series. And there may be another reason why economic papers are written in a stilted and intimidating way. In our everyday lives, loss aversion is especially common when … On top of the above career … Kahneman published “Thinking, Fast and Slow” in 2013. [21] Risk Aversion vs. Loss Aversion Powered by Behavioral Economics. If we have nothing but gain £20, we will be very happy. It’s used to inform very important decisions made in the halls of power. People tend not to focus on statistical standpoints but look for an answer in relation to a specific event occurring. This behavior is at work when we make choices that include both the possibility of a loss or gain. Viele übersetzte Beispielsätze mit "loss aversion" – Deutsch-Englisch Wörterbuch und Suchmaschine für Millionen von Deutsch-Übersetzungen. When speaking about behavioral economics loss aversion is usually the first concept I introduce, and it is a great starting point for this podcast. The authors also ruled out the explanation that lack of experience with trading would lead to the endowment effect by conducting repeated markets. – from £6.99. Buyers who indicated a willingness-to-pay higher than the randomly drawn price got the good, and vice versa for those who indicated a lower WTP. This bias explains why we over value what we already have. Put another way: It is better to not lose $5 than to find $5. William Cooper. Difficult outcomes are typically associated with blind luck and that there is no such thing as sequence of successes that are not random. It is possible that adding affectively arousing factors (e.g. “Loss aversion is essentially a fallacy,” he wrote in Scientific American, explaining his attack on the concept, published at about the same time loss aversion was mentioned as part of the reason Richard Thaler was awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Economics. Is loss-aversion magnitude-dependent? Economics Department, University of Mary Washington, 1004 College Avenue, Fredericksburg, VA 22401; E‐mail: mapostol@umw.edu. Most people flock to the “sure thing”. He stated "It's a deeply ingrained behavioral trait. Suppose we buy a stock for £1,000, but then the shares fall by 10%. Investors will hold onto a tanking stock long after it is clear that the investment is dead in the water, because loss aversion makes it difficult to let go in fear that it might recover. Today’s concept is loss aversion. [4] Although traditional economists consider this "endowment effect", and all other effects of loss aversion, to be completely irrational, that is why it is so important to the fields of marketing and behavioral finance. After several months of training, the monkeys began showing behavior considered to reflect understanding of the concept of a medium of exchange. Since the transaction cost that could have been due to the procedure was equal in the induced-value and goods markets, transaction costs were eliminated as an explanation for the endowment effect. The bonus was equivalent to approximately 8% of the average teacher salary in Chicago Heights, approximately $8,000. Loss aversion refers to our tendency to strongly prefer avoiding losses over acquiring gains. NBER Working Paper No. Loss attention was proposed as a distinct regularity from loss aversion by Eldad Yechiam and Guy Hochman. System 2 being slower, deliberate, and logical. Loss aversion experimentation has most recently been applied within an educational setting in an effort to improve achievement within the U.S. Gill and Prowse (2012) provide experimental evidence that people are loss averse around reference points given by their expectations in a competitive environment with real effort.[16]. Human psychology doesn’t like seeing a loss – so we hold onto the stock – hoping to make a profit on our decision. This phenomenon was first introduced by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahnemann in 1979 in the framework of prospect theory. Given the phenomenon of ‘loss aversion’, it is not difficult to understand why World Bank researchers united against Romer’s initiatives. “losses loom larger than gains” (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). The inverse U-shaped effect implies that the effect of losses on performance is most apparent in settings where task attention is low to begin with, for example in a monotonous vigilance task or when a concurrent task is more appealing. The median prices of buyers and sellers in induced-value markets matched almost every time leading to near perfect market efficiency, but goods markets sellers had much higher selling prices than buyers' buying prices. Loss aversion bias – the irrational belief that losses are bigger than similar-sized gains –can be influential in economics and investment. There is not only not any kink at the reference point. Maria Apostolova‐Mihaylova. They exhibited the same propensity to avoid perceived losses demonstrated by human subjects and investors. Consistent with gain anticipation, the slope of the activation for increasing losses was significantly greater than the slope of the deactivation for increasing gains. [42], Education weekly also weighs in and discusses utilizing loss aversion within education, specifically merit pay. [22]. [1] Loss aversion was first identified by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman.[2]. swiss institute of banking and finance (s/bf – hsg) . Can Myopic Loss Aversion Explain the Equity Premium Puzzle? The basic idea behind loss aversion is that people feel losses much more than gains. This is shown by the slope of brain activity deactivation for increasing losses being significantly greater than the slope of activation for increasing gains in the appetitive system involving the ventral striatum in the network of reward-based behavioural learning. [40], Utilizing loss aversion, specifically within the realm of education, has gotten much notoriety in blogs and mainstream media. This is referred to as an illusionary pattern. What distinguishes loss aversion from risk aversion is that the utility of a monetary payoff depends on what was previously experienced or was expected to happen. Recent results from Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 ranked the US ranks #31 in math[38] and #17 in Reading. Indeed, all of the noted findings in education can be explained simply by the additional attention to a task when it includes losses (i.e., loss attention), independently of the weighting to gains and losses. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 76.2 (1998): 149–188. System 2 is dependent on System 1, making System 2 Y. X predicts Y. (2017);[13] the other, is that the generality of the loss aversion pattern is lower than that thought previously. Our site uses cookies so that we can remember you, understand how you use our site and serve you relevant adverts and content. The article also covers a reaction by Barnett Berry, president of the Center for Teaching Quality, who stated "the study seems to suggest that districts pay 'teachers working with children and adolescents' in the same way 'Chinese factory workers' were paid for 'producing widgets'. These findings suggest a difference in neural development during the avoidance of risk. This involves the ventral caudate nucleus, pallidum, putamen, bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, superior frontal and middle gyri, posterior cingulate cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and parts of the dorsomedial thalamus connecting to temporal and prefrontal cortex. Still, one might argue that loss aversion is more parsimonious than loss attention. What distinguishes loss aversion from risk aversion is that the utility of a monetary payoff depends on what was previously experienced or was expected to happen. Evaluating is associated with the word bias because it tends to be a deciding factor in a “zero validity” situation. We feel the pain of losing something we have almost twice as much as the enjoyment of getting something new. Prospect theory A relevant example (proposed by Mark Twain) is of a cat which jumped of a hot stove and will never do it again, even when the stove is cold and potentially contains food. The basic idea behind loss aversion is that people feel losses much more than gains. Therefore, paradoxically, in their study minor losses led to more selection from the alternative generating them (refuting an explanation of this phenomenon based on loss aversion). They were then given the option of trading the mug for the chocolate or vice versa and those with neither were asked to merely choose between mug and chocolate. Some studies have suggested that losses are twice as powerful, psychologically, as gains. [31] It has to do with the question of incentives to establish working communications with policy-makers. Measuring prospective affective judgments regarding gains and losses. Loss aversion implies that one who loses $100 will lose more satisfaction than another person will gain satisfaction from a $100 windfall. "[44], There has also been other criticism of the notion of loss aversion as an explanation of greater effects. Suppose we invest £100,000 in a new software monitoring system. They state that "a merit pay regime need not pit teachers in a given school against each other to get results".[41]. [39] In this latest experiment, Fryer et al. Loss aversion influences decision making and plays a part in determining the appropriate copy to use in designs. They chose to stop when the values were equal as no matter which random result they received, their expectations would be matched. Such a preference seems strik… This book covered psychological systems and economic strategies. Loss aversion is common in cognitive psychology, decision theory, and behavioral economics. The same change in price framed differently, for example as a $5 discount or as a $5 surcharge avoided, has a significant effect on consumer behavior. Loss Aversion (Behavioural Economics) Levels: A Level, IB. For example, when making investment decisions we most often focus on the risks associated with the investment rather than the potential gains. System 1 being fast, intuitive, and emotional. Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Professional Traders. When the expectations of an individual fail to match reality, they lose an amount of utility from the lack of experiencing fulfillment of these expectations. Exam boards: AQA, Edexcel, OCR, IB, Eduqas, WJEC. Decision-making is hard business. [34] An individual's most recent expectations influences loss aversion in outcomes outside the status quo; a shopper intending to buy a pair of shoes on sale experiences loss aversion when the pair she had intended to buy is no longer available. Telling one… System 1 is who we are, it occurs as X. The first part of this article introduces and discusses the construct of loss aversion. In marketing, the use of trial periods and rebates tries to take advantage of the buyer's tendency to value the good more after the buyer incorporates it in the status quo. It also explains how there was no gain for students when teachers were offered the bonus at the end of the school year. Outcome anticipation and ensuing loss aversion involve multiple neural systems, showing functional and structural individual variability directly related to the actual outcomes of choices. Increased hot stove effect for losses – The hot stove effect is the finding that individuals avoid a risky alternative when the available information is limited to the obtained payoffs. The psychology behind ‘behavioural bias’ is … We could add loss aversion to the growth-rate maximiser in the additive environment by introducing an absorbing state at zero. The only difference is the timing and framing of the rewards. The principle is prominent in the domain of economics. If we understand loss aversion we can phrase content within designs and indeed marketing material for our designs to focus on gains or loss avoidance. The control group followed the traditional merit pay process of receiving "bonus pay" at the end of the year based on student performance on standardized exams. Loss attention refers to the tendency of individuals to allocate more attention to a task or situation when it involve losses than when it does not involve losses. Loss aversion is the tendency to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring equivalent gains. Loss aversion is a condition described by behavioral economists where a person places greater value on avoiding losses than on attaining potential gains. The article states there are "few noteworthy limitations to the study, particularly relative to scope and sample size; further, the outcome measure was a 'low-stakes' diagnostic assessment, not the state test—it's unclear if findings would look the same if the test was used for accountability purposes. straightone . This is also the reason why people keep bread machines, treadmills and their college stereos around the house, as they hate to think of selling it at a loss. This shows that a £100 gain is less than the £100 loss. Biased anticipation of negative outcomes leading to loss aversion involves specific somatosensory and limbic structures. Methodology—"Gain" and "Loss" teachers received identical net payments for a given level of performance. Specifically, the effect of losses is assumed to be on general attention rather than plain visual or auditory attention. Loss aversion is a behavioral economics concept referring to people’s judging the avoidance of loss as being more important than the acquisition of equivalent gain. This helps us find unintended answers, such as riddles or an algebraic problem. This ruled out income effects as an explanation for the endowment effect. Overall, the role of amygdala in loss anticipation suggested that loss aversion may reflect a Pavlovian conditioned approach-avoidance response. With a 50% chance of receiving the "fair" compensation, participants were more likely to quit the experiment as this amount approached the fixed payment. An advance on the payment and the re framing of the incentive as avoidance of a loss, the researchers observed treatment effects in excess of 0.20 and some as high as 0.398 standard deviations. However, the experimental groups received a lump sum given at beginning of the year, that would have to be paid back. Loss aversion being one of the main focuses throughout the book. Finally, losses may have an effect on attention but not on the weighting of outcomes; as suggested, for instance, by the fact that losses lead to more autonomic arousal than gains even in the absence of loss aversion. WAS IST DER UNTERSCHIED ZWISCHEN RISIKO- UND VERLUSTAVERSION? Prospect theory. In several studies, the authors demonstrated that the endowment effect could be explained by loss aversion but not five alternatives: (1) transaction costs, (2) misunderstandings, (3) habitual bargaining behaviors, (4) income effects, or (5) trophy effects. [55], Alternatives to loss aversion: Loss attention. [21], In 2005, experiments were conducted on the ability of capuchin monkeys to use money. Dabei werden Konstellationen untersucht, in denen Menschen im Widerspruch zur Modell-Annahme des Homo oeconomicus, also des rationalen Nutzenmaximierers, agieren. Evaluation is defined by Kahneman as what we distinguish as valid and those, we conclude are likely bogus. Similarly, a positive effect of losses compared to equivalent gains was found on activation of midfrontal cortical networks 200 to 400 milliseconds after observing the outcome.

I Want You Poster Uncle Sam, Anor Londo Chests, Meadows Golf Course Scorecard, Head Tour Team Bag, Gps Tracker For Lorry Malaysia, Crown Mark Bed Frame Instructions,


Leia também

Zona Azul Digital começa a funcionar em caráter piloto em Barueri

Na quinta-feira (dia 25) entrou em operação a Zona Azul Digital em Barueri, tecnologia desenvolvida …